Gilles Bouleau is a French journalist officiating on the TF1 channel. In 2012, this graduate of the Training Center for Private Journalists in Paris replaced Laurence Ferrari as presenter of TF1’s 8 p.m. news. A question is on everyone’s lips: what is Gilles Bouleau’s salary? In the following lines, we will focus on the salary and personal fortune of this talented media man.
Gilles Bouleau was born on May 25, 1962 in Paris, but spent most of his childhood in Colombes in the Hauts-de-Seine. His school career is sanctioned by a diploma from the Paris Institute of Political Studies (Sciences Po) and another from the Paris Journalists Training Center (CFJ). At the age of 26, he is the lucky winner of the Jean d’Arcy prize which rewards the most talented young journalists. He then joined the editorial staff of TF1, a channel to which he would devote most of his professional career.
He began his career at TF1 with the “Economy and Social” department, then moved to the “Internal Policy” department. A few years later, he joined the “Investigations and Reports” department, then the “General Information” department. A hard worker, he was entrusted with several important reports. He thus provided coverage of the French presidential election of 1988, as well as the Winter Games of 1992 and 1994.
Between 1996 and 1996, Gilles Bouleau joined the LCL channel, then a subsidiary of TF1. He notably presents the morning. In 1996, he worked alongside Ruth Elkrief on the show 7 p.m. Sunday. he then acted as deputy editor for this broadcast of reports and interviews.
At the age of 39, he was assigned by TF1 as a correspondent in Shakespeare’s country. He spent 4 years there, then moved to Washington as a correspondent. His five years in the land of Uncle Sam led him to cover major events such as Hurricane Katrina and the 2008 US presidential election, which saw the accession to power of Barack Obama.
The year 2011 sees the return of Gilles Bouleau to the fold. Following the departure of Harry Roselmack, he presents the TF1 8 p.m. newspaper as a joker for Laurence Ferrari. In August 2011, he took over as head of special operations, following the departure of Jean-Claude Narcy. He was then responsible for designing the infographics accompanying the channel’s newspapers.
The year 2012 is the year of consecration of Gilles Bouleau as titular presenter of the prestigious 20 hours news. When Laurence Ferrari resigned from his post in July 2011,
Gilles Bouleau is on vacation. He is called back urgently to ensure the interim. After a few days, our talented journalist was appointed to this position by the governing bodies of TF1. Its discretion and its sobriety, which contrast sharply with the bling-bling side of its predecessors, quickly caused a sensation among viewers who are more and more numerous to follow the show.
The journalist’s talent grew stronger with age. Gilles Bouleau was entrusted with hosting several election evenings on TF1. Alongside Claire Chazal, then Anne-Claire Coudray, he covered the 2017 presidential election, the 2015 regional elections, the 2014 European elections and the 2014 municipal elections.
Assisted by Jean-Pierre Elkabbach (Europe 1), Gilles Bouleau interviews Russian President Vladimir Poutine in June 2014. He is co-opted as presenter of the documentary Sacrifice , a film commemorating the 70th anniversary of the Normandy landings. A month later, he interviews President François Hollande, alongside David Pujadas. In November of the same year, he was granted a second interview by the French president.
In February 2015, he co-presented with Christophe Dechavanne 40 years of shared emotions , a documentary celebrating TF1’s 40th anniversary. From June 2016, he took the reins of Vie politique , a political program broadcast live on Sundays at 6:40 p.m.
Gilles Bouleau’s career shows that nothing can resist passion and a job well done, not even age. Entered by the lowest rung, this journalist knew how, by dint of patience and abnegation, to climb to the highest peaks, thus becoming one of the references in France.
This man of the press shows that everything is possible for those who know how to sacrifice themselves for their dreams. To this end, he is an example to be put forward and not a person to be stoned because of his high income. Who among us does not aspire to well-being? Who doesn’t dream of sleeping in a palace?
Instead of endlessly seeking to pillory media men for their gains, it might be time for the French to change the paradigm. Why not try to take as an example those people who started from scratch to amass a colossal fortune?
After revealing the salaries of David Pujadas and Laurent Delahousse, the magazine TV Télé 2 Semaines looked at Gilles Bouleau’s salary and personal fortune. According to the journalists of the fortnight, our presenter would earn two or three more than his colleagues officiating on France 2. According to their estimates, the Parisian would win the plump sum of 30,000 €.
The magazine TV Télé 2 Semaines has made revealing the fortunes of people, and in particular those of press men, a specialty. The French, it should be remembered, are very fond of this kind of information. Knowing this, presenters like Cyril Hanouna do not hesitate to balance the remuneration of their colleagues live to boost their audience.
Outraged by the indiscretions about his salary, Gilles Bouleau wanted to make an update. He initially denied the magazine’s allegations. However, he did not indicate his salary or other types of remuneration. He simply acknowledged that he was earning quite comfortably and that he was not ashamed to earn so much. He admitted that he made a better living than more deserving workers like doctors and nurses, but that was nothing to beat a spade for.
To the journalists who bombarded him with questions, he simply replied that he earned as much as a good Ligue 2 goalkeeper in France. Note that a “good goalkeeper” of French Ligue 2 receives 300,000 euros in annual salary, or 25,000 euros per month, while a beginner is paid around 26,000 euros per year. Internet users and journalists all rushed into the breach and grabbed their calculators. This joke is the only concession the journalist has made to the media.
A study dating from November 2016 had concluded that the vast majority of players in the League (98%) had a monthly salary of less than €28,000. This study also revealed that only 1% of these players received a salary of between 28,000 and 56,000 €. Persons whose salaries exceeded €95,000 were an exception.
While under other skies, we are delighted to see the remuneration of people soar, the French tend to criticize the salaries paid to media men. It is enough to read the comments aroused by the revelations of the magazine TV Télé 2 to realize it. Even if everyone recognizes their talents, many are those who believe that they should not be paid such a high remuneration.
Gilles Bouleau has somewhat responded to this criticism by stating loud and clear that he had no shame in earning so much money. Perhaps these people should be reminded that the salary paid to Gilles Bouleau is not a charity, but the fruit of a job well done. If the work of this journalist brought nothing to his employer, the latter would not pay him such a salary.
But how to understand that people, who rear up every time we try to touch their benefits, can be so quick to throw the media men to the wolves? Should journalists be destitute to be appreciated?
Those looking for the exact amount of Gilles Bouleau’s compensation will be very disappointed. The salary of the presenter of the 8:00 p.m. news from TF1 remains a well-kept secret. The paparazzi may have snooped around, but they couldn’t figure out the secret. The journalist admitted to earning a comfortable living, but he flatly refused to give the amount of his remuneration, arguing that French legislation protected this secret.
The only indication he provided was that he was earning about as much as a French Ligue 2 player, around 25,000 euros per month. It is not at all wrong to turn off snoopers, because this Franco-French tendency to be indignant at the salaries of pressmen is simply lamentable. The paparazzi and their followers would benefit rather from rejoicing in these remunerations, because they are indicators of the prestige of the country. Who would want a dowdy people in rags?